Tredu Logo
HomeNews & InsightsReviewsResourcesContact UsAbout UsEducators hub
EN
Tredu Logo
Liquidity Logo

Quick Links

  • Home
  • News & Insights
  • Courses
  • Reviews
  • Resources
  • Blog

Company

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

©2025 tredu

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceFAQsCommunity

Note: All information on this page is subject to change. The use of this website constitutes acceptance of our user agreement. Please read our privacy policy and legal disclaimer. Trading foreign exchange on margin carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors...

Financial Efficiency of ImmunityBio and Its Peers in the Biotech Sector

Tredu logo

By Tredu.com • 2025-08-21 11:00:02

Tredu

Financial Efficiency of ImmunityBio and Its Peers in the Biotech Sector
  • ImmunityBio, Inc. (NASDAQ:IBRX) has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) of -79.59% and a Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 10.99%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -7.24.
  • Comparative analysis shows similar challenges among peers, with Nkarta, Inc. displaying the least inefficiency in generating returns relative to its cost of capital.
  • The biotech sector is characterized by high research and development costs, impacting financial metrics and profitability.

ImmunityBio, Inc. (NASDAQ:IBRX) is a biotechnology company focused on developing innovative therapies to treat cancer and infectious diseases. The company is part of a competitive landscape that includes peers like BridgeBio Pharma, Inc., Sana Biotechnology, Inc., Nkarta, Inc., Allogene Therapeutics, Inc., and Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. These companies are all striving to make breakthroughs in the biotech sector, which is known for its high research and development costs.

In evaluating ImmunityBio's financial efficiency, its Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is -79.59%, while its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) is 10.99%. This results in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -7.24, indicating that the company is not currently generating returns that cover its cost of capital. This is a common challenge in the biotech industry, where long development timelines and high costs can impact financial metrics.

Comparatively, BridgeBio Pharma has a ROIC of -72.24% and a WACC of 8.98%, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of -8.04. Sana Biotechnology's figures are -75.50% for ROIC and 11.86% for WACC, resulting in a ratio of -6.37. These numbers show that both companies, like ImmunityBio, are struggling to generate returns above their cost of capital.

Nkarta, Inc. stands out with a ROIC of -29.44% and a WACC of 6.06%, giving it the highest ROIC to WACC ratio among the peers at -4.86. This suggests that Nkarta is the least inefficient in terms of generating returns relative to its cost of capital, despite still operating at a loss. This could indicate a more favorable position for future profitability if trends continue.

Allogene Therapeutics and Recursion Pharmaceuticals also face challenges, with ROIC to WACC ratios of -11.65 and -7.09, respectively. These figures highlight the ongoing struggle within the biotech sector to achieve profitability, as companies invest heavily in research and development to bring new therapies to market.